requestId:68499aab9cb150.71394191.
The era of admiring the elite has ended
Author: Franck Ferred
Translator: Wu Wanwei
Source: Author Authorized by Confucian Network Published
Time: Confucius was the 2568th year of Dingyou March 12th Yichou
Jesus April 8, 2017
What people object to is not truth, but the value of the elite.
When political commentators talk about the arrival of the true world after discussion, the era when they actually mourn the true comments of national institutions and media propaganda are rarely challenged. This kind of sorrow has been here for several years. Every time the public confronts the value of elites, they suffer a sharp rebellion, that is, who is no longer interested in the truth. In fact, the real meaning of the elite is that people no longer care about their version of the truth. So, when French star philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy declared that people had “destroyed the interest of politicians in speaking” he was actually expressing his frustration that he would no longer give his friends his value to him.
The current elites’ grievances over so-called afterlife or posthumous truth public verbals are the latest version of the historical battle–that is, who has the battle of moral authority and ideological authority. In fact, people in many Oriental societies have abandoned the value view and world view of civilized power occupants have always been shaped to reject themselves. The value of the elite is truly admired by love, which began in ancient Greek times, and is therefore the need of social rulers to gain admiration from the people. The encouragement received by the public is not the power of admiring the elite, but the authenticity of the value of the elite.
The reason why this fact is not widely understood is that today’s society is unwilling to admit that its civilized and political careers are still dependent on the values or moral authority of the people, whether actively or deficiently admire the elite. The word “admiration” implies unruly serving the act of authority, and the Oxford English Dictionary interprets it as “a broadly recognized initiative, skill, judgment or other qualities of respect for another person.” (1) In the 19th century, this word was often used to imply that people willingly admire and bow to the elite because they are brilliant. I admire the wisdom and moral dominance that was pre-developed by the middle-level or civilized elites who were taught by the public.
In recent years, I have repeatedly expressed my respectThe era of the elite has ended. We plaintiffs inform people that they prefer to criticize rather than admire others’ cleverness. In this context, admiring others’ views often include the meaning of elimination, which is often equivalent to having no critical thinking ability. But in fact, the elites still ask for admiration from the public. However, this requesting body now calls for respect for experts because they have given their truth. Therefore, in almost every cultivational field of human experience, experts are presented as people who create facts and truth. Those who disrespect experts will face risks, such as being accused of being ignorant of sexuality, stupid science, or perhaps stupid. Therefore, in 2001, Michael Moore, a perfect cynic, could ask american readers who were taught, “Do you think you can live in a naive country?” Moore understood that his readers were as contemptuous as he did for those with low moral character. (2) Tomorrow, many commentators have similar contempt and disdain for Morr. bearingThey regard the people’s value and reject their moral rights as rejecting facts and truth.
Sucrates criticized those who lacked the ability to distinguish their short-terms and led to his trust in the authority of experts at that time.
From a historical perspective, people’s concern for what is now called fake news or post-provoking truth politics and people’s concern for the common people’s ability to distinguish, that is, one is the truth about the interpretation of civilized elites and the other is the reality of other versions. Plato made his first warning of the threat of true belief through the mouth of Sucrates. In his opinion, the invention of writing and reading threatened the truth. The views written by Sucrates are different from those written by the mouth and traffic, and can gain their own vitality and “expand anywhere.” Articles cannot be divided into any articles. support storiesThese are readers who can understand and benefit from traffic, and those who are misled by the article or may be confused. He told that the articles written can be transmitted to the most basic and unaware of them. 彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩. (3) Differences with the parental world of his time, Sucrates hypothesized that if these knowledge of only a half-knowledge falls into the hands of the wrong person, it would be a grand threat to the order of society.
Such’s disagreement with the same department based on this kind of confidence, that is, the request for truth is high, as long as a small number of Athenian citizens can be entrusted to such a task. He believed that knowledge “is not as good as it is.” He learned something that turned into words in science”; it was only after “the continuous interactive communication and cooperative learning of students for a long time”, true knowledge was rushing into people’s souls. (4) Plata’s important concern seems to be not the text of the text but the wide spread of text among the crowd.
In the current self-conscious, inclusive, and obedient public civilization, Sucrates restricted the public from reading the data they chose and the situation they chose. href=”https://twsugarlover.org/”>Breeding Network is bound to be considered a vicious design. However, even in the 21st century, the public is often portrayed as hard-working people without any power under media manipulation. They are beloved by low-levelBreeding the Internet The interesting news industry or advertisers’ wonderful publicity skills lead to evil paths. This kind of worry was infinitely reduced in the Internet era. Now, through the civilized theoryInsurance and refusal to reject the civilized value of political authority, people’s worries about the so-called cowardly position of truth often appear to be a moral urgent.
Sucrates criticized those who lacked the ability to distinguish shortness and shortness, which led him to trust the authority of the experts at that time, or the “philosopher scholar” he imagined. He respected the authority of Athenian Buyi, and believed that the people lacked the required intellectual resources to grasp the truth. In the “Applications” In some of Sucrates’ comments “What should I do next?”, he looked for not the views, but the views he put forward after obtaining more informed information and gaining more basic thoughts.” (5) Therefore, Sucrates put forward a certain doubt and admires professional knowledge.
As he said, if society is ready to respect experts, neglecting the popular view of ordinary people on professional issues such as shipbuilding or perhaps constructionPoint, why can’t we accept the admiration of experts in political issues? In his and P彩彩ro<a In the conversation on the tagoras, Sucrates pointed out that "if the content of the discussion is related to national management, stand up and teach the people who are close to the people, perhaps a construction craftsman or iron craftsman or cobbler or merchant or captain, whether they are rich or not, whether they have a good family landscape." (6) Sucrates's view was that it was impossible to look for the truth from the people themselves. As for him, if compared with experts who are really clear about serious issues, it is not very important that most officials think about political issues. (Song Wei was stunned for a moment, then smiled with his lips and said, "Chen Jubai, you are so stupid." 7)
The political elites were infected by the impression that the people no longer respect their views and value, but they mistakenly believed that the people refused to truly respect themselves.
Sucrates trusts in the political field and needs wise people to grasp the truth. Although he was waiting for the authority of moral experts to guide the people to gain real insights, he did not understand how to explain where to find these special talents. Only when it is modern times, when the focus is on changing from the philosopher’s moral expert to the scientific factual expert, can we find the problem of political expert be solved.
Admiring experts
The public career of Oriental Society is due to this hypothesis, that is, the opinions of the experts are admired by the people. Politicians often remind us that their policies are “certification-based”, which
發佈留言